December 21, 2024

2 thoughts on “TN House IEA Bill (Special Ed Vouchers)

  1. I am very excited about the possibility of using this “voucher” program. My son is 5 but is developmentally only about 3. He is not ready for kindergarten in a large school (even though we love the special ed team there) and he needs WAY more than 3-4 part time days in an exclusive special ed setting (where he is now in our county). With this voucher, I will be able to put him in a small, happily integrated private school where he can learn at his own pace, spend his day with typical peers and have individual attention for meals and potty time. He may go back to the public school the following year or we may find a program that can accommodate him for another year before he returns.
    Parents who are educated advocates for their children know that there are individualized services they can get for their children outside of the public schools without having a fight a system and wait “60 days” while the school “collects data” to support adding in the services that the parent KNOWS the child needs NOW. It is a win- win situation!

    1. Sadly, that isn’t how this program works. Parents are required to sign away ALL of their child’s rights to services that the federal government included in IDEA. The purpose of IDEA was to protect students and ensure schools were required to supply appropriate services. However, once a parent accepts this payout, they also have to sign away those rights. There is NOTHING in the law that reinstates those rights when the parent realizes the money isn’t enough to cover all of the services that would have been supplied by the public school district and returns to the public school. When the child enrolls in public school, the parent has signed off that the school district is no longer responsible for supplying those services. The parent is fully responsible.

      The bill serves to do two things: to segregate special needs students from the general education population and to save money by giving parents a smaller amount than the school districts would otherwise spend to meet the needs of the child. It is a shameful way to trick parents into thinking they are doing something good for children, when it ends up doing exactly the opposite.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *